Recently, Huang's 22 boxes of clothing were handed over to the logistics company for shipment.

During the pportation, 18 boxes of clothing were contaminated, and the loss was about 300000 yuan, including one piece worth 128 thousand yuan.

。

Because Mr. Huang had not insured the price when he checked it, the day before yesterday, the court of Yueqing ruled that Mr. Huang could only get 5 times the amount of compensation freight - 3145 yuan.

In November 23, 2014, Mr. Huang packed 22 boxes of clothing and handed them to a local logistics company, which was consigned to Longyan, Fujian. During the course of pportation, 18 boxes of clothing were contaminated by the leakage of diesel fuel, and returned to Yueqing 3 days later.

Mr. Huang found 3 of them.

And 7 scarves were heavily polluted, including two mink fur, worth 128000 yuan and 65800 yuan respectively; fur coats valued at 12800 yuan; 7 Rex Rabbit scarves, each worth 150 yuan.

In addition, there are 20 items of leather clothing which are slightly polluted and need urgent handling.

Mr. Huang and the logistics company failed to negotiate compensation. He filed a lawsuit with the Yueqing court and asked the logistics company to compensate for the loss.

However, according to the uninsured value, the compensation fee is 5 times the 757 yuan of pportation fee, which is 3785 yuan and other expenses, such as the inspection of unpacking, the labor cost of the box, and the delay of the opening time in Longyan.

The logistics company has no objection to the contamination of the 18 cartons of goods during the pportation of goods, but according to the contract law, the goods without the value insured will be compensated by a maximum of 5 times the freight.

The court heard in Yueqing that Mr. Huang

Paying the consignment fee, the logistics company provides the freight service to Mr. Huang, and the freight contract relationship between the defendant and the defendant.

After the signing of the freight contract, the logistics company should be liable for damages in the course of pportation due to its own cause.

Mr. Huang argued that the logistics company should bear the liability of compensation 5 times of the consignment fee. The logistics company also agreed that the court would support it.

The court will not support Mr. Huang's other claims.

The court found that the consignment charge for 18 cases of contaminated goods was 629 yuan, not 757 yuan.

The Yueqing court finally decided that the logistics company should pay the plaintiff Huang's compensation amount of 3145 yuan.